His puck skills are higher than his defense! You don't need a professional scout to tell you that's whack. Kruger only gets 3.5 out of 5 stars on defense, which makes no damn sense. McNeill, Desjardins, Kruger and Rasmussen almost certainly should have wider variance than that. Most of this makes sense, but I think you can already see where the rating system has trouble in bunching up lower-tier players. So we'll have to wait on ratings for Nick Schmaltz, Tyler Motte, Michal Kempny and more, which obviously makes this situation look a bit more dire than it'll be soon. It's also worth noting that the developers are forced to wait to add rookies to the game until they've actually appeared in the NHL due to a quirk in their agreement with the NHLPA. But if they want to still consider Brent Seabrook and Marian Hossa as two of the best players in the league, fine, I’ll take it. There are definitely some ratings that I disagree with, which isn’t surprising considering EA reportedly uses just a single scout to determine those numbers.
With all of that in mind, here’s a look at the Blackhawks’ player ratings in "NHL 17," as well as their potential ratings for franchise mode. Still, as someone who loves hockey, I’ll be playing the game a lot over the coming year. If you want the summary: "NHL 17" is pretty good, but single player modes feel like they get the short straw a bit. The Hawks should once again be fun to play with in the game, which I recently discussed here. Namely, "NHL 17" is now out on PlayStation 4 and Xbox One, which means hockey fans are diving into the latest edition of EA Sports’ wacky physics simulator. The Chicago Blackhawks are looking pretty good in real life, but there are more important matters to handle right now. Here are the Blackhawks' player ratings in the latest NHL video game.
0 kommentar(er)
